Utility maximization, morality, and religion.
Journal of Economic Issues › Vol. 39 Nbr. 2, June 2005
Linked as:
Journal of Economic Issues › Vol. 39 Nbr. 2, June 2005
Linked as:Extract
Utility maximization, morality, and religion.
One of the most important foundation stones for neoclassical economics is utility maximization theory. This theory assumes that all choices are made to maximize the chooser's utility, happiness, or pleasure. The theory can be expanded by explaining that what maximizes a chooser's utility, happiness, or pleasure is achieving his or her goals. Goals can run the entire gamut from complete self-indulgence to saving others (a goal that may require self-sacrifice, as it did for Martin Luther King, Jr., Mother Theresa, Jesus, and Buddha). Because all goals are accepted, utility maximization theory can be used to explain all choices including marriage, terrorism, altruism, raising families, war, and so on. Neoclassical economists are proud that this theory can explain every possible choice.
In order to maintain the universal applicability of utility maximization theory, neoclassical economists refuse to judge one set of goals as better or worse than another set of goals. The judging of diffe...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
the United States of America Plaintiff-Appellee v Herbert Ackerman Defendant-Appellant. 393 F.2d 121 7th Cir 1968 | Lnp Engineering Plastics, Inc. and Kawasaki Chemical Holding Co., Inc., Plaintiffs-Appell... | Acquisition regulations: Commercially available off-the-shelf items; specialty metals restriction waiver, | Meetings: Earthquake Hazards Reduction Advisory Committee, | Sentencia nº 2313 de Consiglio di Stato, May 08, 2009 | Sentencia nº 3994 de Consiglio di Stato September 15 2011 | Resolución nº 363, de Corte de Apelaciones de Chillan - Sala Primera Sala, January 14, 2009 | Sentencia nº 297429 de Corte de Apelaciones de Santiago Sala Tercera November 14 2011