Summary
"They are turning the disciplinary process into a laughingstock," said [Carole Squire] in an exclusive interview with The CALL & POST. The purpose: to get off the bench, and out of the practice of law, a person who was not a part of "the system."
In some instances, Squire noted, the Supreme Court, which accepted the findings of fact of the state's Disciplinary Counsel, ruled against Squire using the testimony of only one witness - the complaining attorney who made the allegation against Squire - rather than accepting the testimony contradicting the complaining attorney's version given by as many as seven different witnesses."They have distorted truth and justice beyond recognition," said Squire. "I know it is a miscarriage of justice, and the findings on which this decision was made are riddled with mistakes of law and fact, and information that is not true."See the full content of this document
Extract
Squire Claims Ruling Unfair
For Carole Squire, the recent decision by the Ohio Supreme Court to suspend her law license for one year based on a finding that she had engaged in inconsiderate and intemperate behavior in her former role as a Franklin County Domestic Rel...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
