Positioning Nrpa On Offshore Drilling and a 'Conservation Royalty'
Parks & Recreation › Vol. 44 Nbr. 8, August 2009
Linked as:
Parks & Recreation › Vol. 44 Nbr. 8, August 2009
Linked as:Summary
Proponents of the conservation royalty thought that the precedent was established when royalties were required from drilling in the western Gulf tit Mexico in the early 1960s, but Congress opted not to place these revenues off-budget, making the allocation of these revenues subject to the politics of the annual appropriations process, More recently, Congress did approve dedicating such revenues troni new leases in an expanded area in the Gulf of Mexico known as Area 181 South, to LWCF stateside purposes with the passage of the Knergy Security Act of 2006. [...] we believe that it is important to try and moderate the "noise" that goes with this discussion and to focus on the truly important issues, as well as ensuring that NRPA is at the table when discussions are taking place.
See the full content of this document
Extract
Positioning Nrpa On Offshore Drilling and a 'Conservation Royalty'
Last year, when gas was $4 per gallon and Congress was ratcheting up pressure to expand domestic energy production, the 2009 Appropriations Bill was approved for the first time in 25 years without a morato- rium on off-shore drilling. The lifting of this moratorium means that without an about-face by Congress, which is considered highly unlikely, there may be new off-shore drilling within littoral areas from ...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
hypo real estate closes $206 million construction loan. | EPCglobal US Introduces Value Models for the Chemical Aerospace and Retail Pharmacy Industries to Q... | The Mills Corporation Declares Dividends for Common, Preferred Stock. | Research and Markets: Vehicle Smart Key System Evaluation: Audi A6. | Decisión nº OP01-P-2010-001414 de Tribunal de Primera Instancia en lo Penal en Funciones de Control N° 3 de Nueva Esparta de June 08 2010 | Decisión nº 2019 de Tribunal Tercero de Primera Instancia en lo Civil Mercantil y del Tránsito ... | decisión nº 21 de juzgado de los municipios rivas dávila y padre noguera de merida, de may 12, 2... | Decisión nº 101 de Tribunal de Protección del Niño y del Adolescente Extensión El Vigía de Merida (Extensión El Vigia), de February 17, 2...