Pick the server that will serve your group best.
Communications News › Vol. 30 Nbr. 4, April 1993
Linked as:
Communications News › Vol. 30 Nbr. 4, April 1993
Linked as:Summary
Column
Important aspects to consider when choosing a server or superserver from the plethora of vendors and products are the number of users and the applications that will be used. A 386-based system is appropriate for a group of less than 20 users, but multiple departments totalling more than 50 users require powerful servers that have upgradeable processors. In a Business Research Group survey, one third of 300 Fortune 1000 firms chose Intel 486-based superservers, and 15 percent chose 386-based microcomputers. In a Forrester Research survey of Fortune 1000 firms, server choices were based on reliability, flexibility and upgradeability. Leading vendors are Compaq Computer Corp, Dell Computer and Everex, as well as Sun Microsystems.See the full content of this document
Extract
Pick the server that will serve your group best.
As more organizations rush to embrace client/server computing, vendors of all stripes and sizes are jostling to position their machines as network servers.
PC makers promote their 386-based machines as file or applications servers, ...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
2009 Inauguration a Dress for Success the Right Inaugural Gown Will Weave Hope and Restraint | Mix of Industries Helping Wisconsin States with Mostly Auto Plants Faring Worse Fed Official Says | Rams in the Field; St. Louis Football Team to Announce Concordia As Its New Home for Nfl Summer Camp | Regional News Watch Gop Legislators Offer to Limit Virtual-School Enrollment | Sentencia nº 2794 de Consiglio di Stato June 16 2010 | sentencia nº 2884 de consiglio di stato, june 03, 2008 | Sentencia nº 1947 de Consiglio di Stato, May 06, 2011 | Sentencia nº 2369 de Consiglio di Stato May 13 2009