Monitoring and Evaluation of Department of Defense: Humanitarian Assistance Programs
Military Review › Vol. 88 Nbr. 3/4, June 2008
Linked as:
Military Review › Vol. 88 Nbr. 3/4, June 2008
Linked as:Summary
Civilian U.S. Government agencies evaluate the effectiveness of their programs through monitoring and evaluation (M&E), but equivalent analyses of DOD humanitarian assistance programs have been either ad hoc or entirely lacking.1 "Monitoring" is the ongoing, systematic collection, analysis, and use of data during the course of a project.2 "Evaluation" is the periodic review of program activity, outcome, and impact, with an emphasis on lessons learned.3 This article presents the case that DOD should institute both monitoring and evaluation of HA activities in order to assess their effectiveness. Such training would also help refine and customize theater M&E techniques, enhance familiarity with existing databases, and train a larger number of project officers.12 Conclusion The complexity of today's security environment requires a new, sophisticated analysis of the efficacy of DOD humanitarian assistance programs.
See the full content of this document
Extract
Monitoring and Evaluation of Department of Defense: Humanitarian Assistance Programs
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) executes humanitarian activities primarily through the Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster and Civic Aid (OHDACA) program. The OHDACA program includes three sub-activities: the Humanitarian Assistance (HA) program, the Humanitarian Mine Action program, and Foreign Disaster Relief and Emergency Response. Activities funded by the OHDACA appropriation are intended to mitigate the effects of natural and man-made disasters, to shape the environment in which DOD operates by providing access to critical areas and by influencing civilian populations, and to improve the capacity of vulnerable nations to better prepare for disasters. The ultimate beneficiary of OHDACA activities is the civilian population, and the activities should always have an appropriate and positive influence. For instance, renovating a school should positively impact primary education, and renovating a clinic should positively impact the civilian health sector.
Civilian U.S. Government agencies evaluate the effectiveness of their programs through monitoring and evaluation (M&E), but equivalent analyses of DOD humanitarian assistance programs have been either ad hoc or entirely lacking.1 "Monitoring" is the on...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
No N-Waste at Skull Valley | Ex-Teacher Accused of Abuse | Monmouth Sticks with Referendum | Home & Garden Ideas | Sentencia nº 84 de Consiglio di Stato March 03 2010 | Sentencia nº 3505 de Consiglio di Stato, July 02, 2008 | Sentenza nº 4431 de Consiglio di Stato July 15 2009 | Sentencia nº 5130 de Consiglio di Stato, October 01, 2008