New Id Rules Present Challenges for Elections Officials, Voters
Campaigns & Elections › Vol. 25 Nbr. 5, June 2004
Linked as:
Campaigns & Elections › Vol. 25 Nbr. 5, June 2004
Linked as:Summary
Some civil rights groups, legislators and officials have said they are concerned that inconsistent and improper implementation of this requirement could disenfranchise voters by having them incorrectly turned away at the polls for not having ID or what a poll worker tells them is the right form of ID (and not offering them provisional ballots). Many black Democratic lawmakers stated the new ID proposal for state and local elections harkened back to the days of poll taxes and life before the Voting Rights Act of 1965, when black voters were disenfranchised throughout the South.
See the full content of this document
Extract
New Id Rules Present Challenges for Elections Officials, Voters
In Ohio's March primary, the state asked first-time voters who registered by mail to show identification at the polls, in accordance with the Help America Vote Act (HAVA).
The issue of voter identification has almost completely...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Ares Capital Corporation Schedules Earnings Release for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31 2010. | Xilinx Inc to Exhibit at 2011 International CES, Booth MP25333 South Hall, Jan 6 - 9, ... | research and markets: global trends in tea: identifying growth opportunities. | City Gunshot Victim Never Saw Shooter | Sentenza nº 6608 de Tribunali Amministrativi Regionali, Campania, T.A.R. - Campania - Napoli, July 10, 2007 | Resolución nº 18165 de Corte de Apelaciones de Valparaiso Sala Segunda May 02 2005 | Sentencia de Cour de cassation July 06 1966 caso Cour de Cassation Chambre commerciale du 6 juillet 1966 | Sentencia de Cour de cassation, October 16, 1984 (caso Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile 1, du 16 octobre 1984, 83-13.473)