A critique of the self-interested voter model: the case of a local single issue referendum.
Journal of Economic Issues › Vol. 28 Nbr. 4, December 1994
Linked as:
Journal of Economic Issues › Vol. 28 Nbr. 4, December 1994
Linked as:Summary
The application of economic principles to generally non-economic issues is considered for the self-interested voter model. The model is an attempt to explain public choice in political behavior. It is shown that the model needs the integration of civic duty and community benefits to augment self-interested behavior in generating an accurate prediction of election outcome.
See the full content of this document
Extract
A critique of the self-interested voter model: the case of a local single issue referendum.
In recent years, economists have sought to extend the logic of marginal analysis to topics not traditionally considered within the domain of the discipline. Among the areas to which this analysis has been expanded is political behavior under a research program widely known as public choice.(1) The empirical tradition of public choice uses the utility maximization behavioral assumption of economic theory to construct and estimate models of voting behavior [Mueller 1989; Mitchell 1990]. At the conceptual level, this assumption permits inclusion of direct self-interest, altruism, and community duty in explanations of decisions on whether and how to vote. However, predictive empirical models of voter choice typically specify an individual's utility function solely in terms of direct self-interest [Feldman 1984, 229].
Within the empirical public choice literature, direct tests of the self-interested voter assumption have been hampered by two data problems. First, while hypotheses are about motivations and responses of individual voters, the data available is usually aggregate census data or voting precinct data. The problems of using aggregate data in testing hypotheses about individual voter decision making have been noted in several studies [Deacon and Shapiro 1975; Rubinfeld 1977; Lowery and Sigelman 1981]. A second complication arises because candidates for election represent a multitude of issues. Interpreting ...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
natrol s prolab business poised for growth new senior marketing teams drive prolab business growth on both sides of the pond . | FuelCell Energy Receives $2.5 Million Contract from the Office of Naval Research to Advance High-Efficiency Ship Service Fuel Cell Power Plant. | ARCADIS Acquires U.K. Consulting Company. | Always watching. | Decisión de Juzgado del Municipio Esteller de Portuguesa de October 18 2005 | Decisión de Tribunal Tercero de Primera Instancia en Funciones de Control de Sucre Extensión Cumaná de A... | Decisión de Juzgado Primero de Primera Instancia en lo Civil, Mercantil y Transito Los Teques de Miranda, de January 28, 2005 | Decisión de Juzgado del Municipio Lagunillas de Zulia de November 18 2010