Campaign Reform: A Way Forward.

Washington MonthlyVol. 31 Nbr. 3, March 1999

Linked as:

Summary


U.S. political campaign reform

The 1998 midterm elections showed that the populace has lost interest in politics and that the politician with most money tends to win. Of 401 Congressmen who sought re-election, 98.3% won and they spent on average 5 times the amount of money than their challengers. There are various possible solutions, including campaign finance reform and a change in the political culture.

See the full content of this document

Extract


Campaign Reform: A Way Forward.

Close the loopholes, provide free air time, and fire the consultants

Throughout the impeachment debate this winter, members of Congress kept paying homage to the "sanctity" and the "solemnity" of elections. As an affirmation of constitutional scripture, their words were apt. As an argument against removing a president, they were powerful. But as a portrait of modern politics, they were hooey.

Elections have lost their pride of place at the center of our democratic life. They are bloated with money, stale with ads, devoid of citizens and impervious to change. No one knows this better--or profits from it more--than members of Congress.

Consider the 1998 mid-term elections. They set all sorts of the wrong kind of records, among them:

A record for non-competitiveness. Of the 401 members of the House who sought reelection last fall, a record 98.3 percent won. They outspent their challengers by an average ratio of five to one, and they piled up an average victory margin of 43 percentage...

See the full content of this document

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company