Complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act: costs and tax treatment.
The National Public Accountant › Vol. 38 Nbr. 6, June 1993
Linked as:
The National Public Accountant › Vol. 38 Nbr. 6, June 1993
Linked as:Summary
An analysis of the kinds of costs employers will incur resulting from compliance with provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 is presented. Two tax provisions which employers can avail themselves of in mitigating the net costs of compliance are specifically explored. These are the architectural and transportation barrier removal expense and the disabled access credit.
See the full content of this document
Extract
Complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act: costs and tax treatment.
The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 was enacted to guarantee individuals with disabilities equal opportunity in employment, public accommodations, state and local government services, transportation and telecommunications. Many businesses must already comply or comply soon with the provisions dealing with employment and public accommodations.|1~ The employment requirements were effective on July 26, 1992, for employers with 25 or more employees and will become effective on July 26, 1994, for employers with 15 to 24 employees. The public accommodations requirements were effective in general on January 26, 1992. Businesses with 25 or fewer employees and gross receipts...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
arlene antkowiak | Market Mood Shifts As the Euro Falls | Evergreen Investments Announces Changes to Closed-End Funds. | CryoPort to Present at the Source Capital Group Small Cap Virtual Conference. | Arrêté du 1er septembre 2003 portant agrément d une mutuelle | Sentencia nº 1510 de Consiglio di Stato March 25 2009 | Sentencia nº 3769 de Consiglio di Stato, July 15, 2008 | Sentencia nº 40 de Consiglio di Stato, January 09, 2010