Advocate Says Horne has No Legal Standing to Appeal 'Flores' Decision
Arizona Capitol Times › September 07, 2006
Linked as:
Arizona Capitol Times › September 07, 2006
Linked as:Summary
Briefs in a federal lawsuit over how the state funds programs to teach students English have been filed in federal appeals court in advance of a hearing next month.
In a June 7 filing with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, public interest attorney Tim Hogan argued that, not only does the basis of the appeal not pass judicial muster, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne, who filed the appeal in March, has no standing in the case.See the full content of this document
Extract
Advocate Says Horne has No Legal Standing to Appeal 'Flores' Decision
Mr. Horne is appealing a lower federal court's ruling that English language learner, or ELL, students do not have to pass the AIMS test...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Griesbach Donald R. | Review; an Alternate Take On the Bard; Amended Winter's Tale' has Highlights and Flaws | Voters Guide Election 2005 Development Issues Key in Race in Town of Waterford | pizzino, rosemary | sentencia nº 908 de consiglio di stato february 17 2009 | sentencia nº 1281 de consiglio di stato march 10 2009 | Sentencia nº 5574 de Consiglio di Stato October 21 2008 | sentencia nº 3924 de consiglio di stato august 31 2010