Summary
Dharma literature of India
See the full content of this document
Extract
Abhaksya and abhojya: an exploration in dietary language.
IF THE WAY TO A PERSON'S HEART iS through the stomach, then the way to the soul of a civilization may be through its dietary practices. Examining the food habits of a people has been a staple among anthropologists, some of whom, like Mary Douglas (1966) in her piece on Jewish dietary laws "The Abominations of Leviticus," have ventured into interpreting the food taboos and dietary restrictions encoded in ancient texts. The ancient Indian literature on dharma devotes considerable attention to matters of food: what kinds of animals and vegetables may or may not be eaten, from what sorts of people one may or may not receive food, what types of conditions make food unfit for consumption, and so on. Such practices have drawn considerable attention among scholars; what has been ignored, however, is the vocabulary used to indicate food prohibitions, a vocabulary that may give us new insights into the ancient Indian world. (1) And that is the focus of this paper.
The dharma vocabulary of food proscriptions contains four words: abhaksya, abhojya, anadya, and apeya. In this paper I will focus on the first two, abhaksya and abhojya, which alone underwent significant semantic developments and assumed technical meanings. Apeya is restricted to liquids, principally milk. Anadya is, relatively speaking, the most frequent term in the vedic literature, occurring a total of nine times, often in the metaphorical sense that the Brahmana should not be eaten by the king: brahmano 'nadyah. (2) This term occurs with some frequency in the dharma literature, but it did not develop the kind of technical meaning that the other two did. (3) Abhaksya and abhojya are, of course, the negative forms of bhaksya and bhojya. The positive forms of the words have been studied in detail by Toru Yagi (1994). I will only mention that these two terms, even though they are gerundives, for the most part lack any prescriptive or permissive meaning: they do not mean "what should be eaten" or "what may be eaten" but are simply types of food. It is within the context of the negative forms, abhaksya and abhojya, that the terms assumed a st...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
